TABLES - TR00-140006
CONVERSION FACTORS: U.S. CUSTOMARY TO METRIC (SI) UNITS OF MEASUREMENT - TR00-140007
INTRODUCTION - TR00-140008
Project Overview
Icehydraulic conditions
ICS DESIGN
Figure 6. Plan view of 1:15-scale refrigerated hydraulic model of Cazenovia Creek
Model results
Table 2. Summary of test conditions and results obtained
Figure 9. Measured downstream overturning moment (test 5, M1), showing peak impulsive and sustained moments.
Figure 11. Cumulative probability for measured peak down- stream overturning moments, Md. The straight line represents the best-fit normal distribution to the data.
Figure 14. Ratio of transverse-to-downstream moments versus downstream moment, My, at the time of peak transverse moment, Mx, during each test.
Additional ICS features
ICS design recommendations
Figure 15. Topographic map of reach of Cazenovia Creek valley modeled for upstream effects caused by the cylindrical-pier ICS. (From USGS Orchard Park Quadrangle, 1965.)
Transport losses
Ice washouts
Model calibration
Figure 18. Open-water calibration of HEC-RAS model with ICS (Plan 60). Observed WSE's are from physical model. Channel distance is relative to location of ICS (positive upstream).
Results - TR00-140025
Figure 21. Ice-jam profiles induced by the ICS at three discharges, with ice volume limited according to Figure 16.
Table 6. Maximum waterlevels expected upstream of the ICS
DISCUSSION - TR00-140028
LITERATURE CITED - TR00-140029
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE - TR00-140030
TR00-14
CONVERSION FACTORS: U.S. CUSTOMARY TO METRIC (SI) UNITS OF MEASUREMENT - TR00-140007
INTRODUCTION - TR00-140008
Project Overview
Icehydraulic conditions
ICS DESIGN
Figure 6. Plan view of 1:15-scale refrigerated hydraulic model of Cazenovia Creek
Model results
Table 2. Summary of test conditions and results obtained
Figure 9. Measured downstream overturning moment (test 5, M1), showing peak impulsive and sustained moments.
Figure 11. Cumulative probability for measured peak down- stream overturning moments, Md. The straight line represents the best-fit normal distribution to the data.
Figure 14. Ratio of transverse-to-downstream moments versus downstream moment, My, at the time of peak transverse moment, Mx, during each test.
Additional ICS features
ICS design recommendations
Figure 15. Topographic map of reach of Cazenovia Creek valley modeled for upstream effects caused by the cylindrical-pier ICS. (From USGS Orchard Park Quadrangle, 1965.)
Transport losses
Ice washouts
Model calibration
Figure 18. Open-water calibration of HEC-RAS model with ICS (Plan 60). Observed WSE's are from physical model. Channel distance is relative to location of ICS (positive upstream).
Results - TR00-140025
Figure 21. Ice-jam profiles induced by the ICS at three discharges, with ice volume limited according to Figure 16.
Table 6. Maximum waterlevels expected upstream of the ICS
DISCUSSION - TR00-140028
LITERATURE CITED - TR00-140029
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE - TR00-140030
TR00-14
