Testing of Materials from the Minnesota Cold Regions Pavement Research Test Facility
TEST RESULTS - SR96_200010
Figure 1. Grain size distribution of Mn/ROAD materials
Figure 1. Continued
Table 2. Physical properties of Mn/ROAD materials
Atterberg limits
Figure 3. Compaction test results.
Table 4. Tentative frost susceptibility criteria
Table 5. Frost susceptibility test results
Figure 4. Data from frost susceptibility test on Mn/ROAD materials
Hydraulic properties
Figure 6. Moisture retention test results
Figure 6. Continued - SR96_200021
Table 6. Coefficients for hydraulic properties in the form of Gardner's equations
Figure 7. Tension vs. hydraulic conductivity curves
Unfrozen moisture content
Figure 8. Degree of saturation vs. hydraulic conductivity curves
Figure 9. Temperature vs. gravimetric unfrozen water content curves
CONCLUSIONS - SR96_200027
LITERATURE CITED-continued - SR96_200028
APPENDIX A. GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF MN/DOT MATERIALS
APPENDIX A. Continued - SR96_200030
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF COMPACTION DATA
APPENDIX B. Continued - SR96_200032
APPENDIX B. Continued - SR96_200033
APPENDIX B. Continued - SR96_200034
APPENDIX C. FROST SUSCEPTIBLITY TEST DATA
APPENDIX C. Continued - SR96_200036
APPENDIX C. Continued - SR96_200037
APPENDIX C. Continued - SR96_200038
APPENDIX C. Continued - SR96_200039
APPENDIX D. PRESSURE PLATE PERMEAMETER TEST RESULTS
APPENDIX D. Continued - SR96_200041
APPENDIX D. Continued - SR96_200042
APPENDIX E. UNFROZEN WATER CONTENT--MN/DOT MATERIALS
Report Documentation Page - SR96_200044
SR96_20
TEST RESULTS - SR96_200010
Figure 1. Grain size distribution of Mn/ROAD materials
Figure 1. Continued
Table 2. Physical properties of Mn/ROAD materials
Atterberg limits
Figure 3. Compaction test results.
Table 4. Tentative frost susceptibility criteria
Table 5. Frost susceptibility test results
Figure 4. Data from frost susceptibility test on Mn/ROAD materials
Hydraulic properties
Figure 6. Moisture retention test results
Figure 6. Continued - SR96_200021
Table 6. Coefficients for hydraulic properties in the form of Gardner's equations
Figure 7. Tension vs. hydraulic conductivity curves
Unfrozen moisture content
Figure 8. Degree of saturation vs. hydraulic conductivity curves
Figure 9. Temperature vs. gravimetric unfrozen water content curves
CONCLUSIONS - SR96_200027
LITERATURE CITED-continued - SR96_200028
APPENDIX A. GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF MN/DOT MATERIALS
APPENDIX A. Continued - SR96_200030
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF COMPACTION DATA
APPENDIX B. Continued - SR96_200032
APPENDIX B. Continued - SR96_200033
APPENDIX B. Continued - SR96_200034
APPENDIX C. FROST SUSCEPTIBLITY TEST DATA
APPENDIX C. Continued - SR96_200036
APPENDIX C. Continued - SR96_200037
APPENDIX C. Continued - SR96_200038
APPENDIX C. Continued - SR96_200039
APPENDIX D. PRESSURE PLATE PERMEAMETER TEST RESULTS
APPENDIX D. Continued - SR96_200041
APPENDIX D. Continued - SR96_200042
APPENDIX E. UNFROZEN WATER CONTENT--MN/DOT MATERIALS
Report Documentation Page - SR96_200044
SR96_20
