Fish, A.M. (1992) Three-dimensional visco-plastic
eral trend of predicted values of ice strength as
flow model of polycrystalline ice. In Proceed-
functions of the hydrostatic pressure is well con-
ings, 3rd International Conference on Ice Technol-
firmed by Jones' test data.
ogy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cam-
bridge, Massachusetts, 1113 August (T.K.S. Murphy,
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
W.M. Sackinger, and P. Wadhams, Eds.) South-
ampton, U.K.: Computational Mechanics Publ.,
1. A temperature model has been developed
p. 193207.
that describes the ice strength in a multiaxial stress
state over a wide spectrum of negative (subfreez-
of ice under multiaxial stress. Journal of Offshore
ing) temperatures.
and Polar Engineering, 12(3): 130139.
2. The strength dependency of ice on the hy-
Gagnon, R.E., and P.H. Gammon (1995) Triaxial
drostatic pressure and temperature is well de-
experiments on iceberg and glacier ice. Journal of
scribed by eq 5a, which is a parabolic yield crite-
Glaciology, 41(139): 538540.
rion:
Hallam, S., and J.P. Nadreau (1988) Failure maps
for ice. In Proceedings, 9th International Conference
2
p
τ io(p, T) = (c + bp) - (c + bp*)
on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Condi-
(5a)
p *
tions (POAC `87) 1722 August, Fairbanks, Alaska
(W.M. Sackinger, and M.O. Jeffries, Eds.) Geophysi-
with only three fundamental physically well-
cal Institute of AlaskaFairbanks, vol. 3, p. 4555.
founded parameters: the ice cohesion c(T), angle
Hausler, F.U. (1983) Comparison between differ-
of internal friction φ(T) or b(T), and ice melting
ent yield functions for saline ice. Annals of Glaciol-
pressure p*(T). They all have a definite physical
ogy, 4: 105109.
meaning and are functions of temperature.
Jones, D.E., F.E. Kennedy, and E.M. Schulson
3. The temperature model was developed
(1991) The kinetic friction of saline ice against
based upon data on over 100 triaxial compression
itself at low sliding velocities. Annals of Glaciology,
tests of iceberg ice and laboratory-made fresh-
15: 242246.
water randomly oriented polycrystalline ice with
Jones, S.J. (1978) Triaxial testing of polycrystal-
a grain diameter between ~ 1 mm and ~ 8 mm in the
line ice. In Proceedings, 3rd International Conference
temperature range between 1 and 40C at the
on Permafrost, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. vol. 1,
range of strain rates between 103 s1 and 105 s1.
p. 670674.
4. Further studies are required of the tempera-
Jones, S.J. (1982) The confined compressive
ture dependencies of the ice strength parameters
strength of polycrystalline ice. Journal of Glaciol-
for various types of ice, particularly the ice melt-
ogy, 28(98): 171177.
ing pressure over a wider spectrum of tempera-
Jones, S.J., and H.A.M. Chew (1983) Creep of ice
tures, strain rates, and confining pressures.
as a function of hydrostatic pressure. Journal of
Physical Chemistry, 87(21): 40644066.
Nadreau, J.P., and B. Michel (1986) Yield and
LITERATURE CITED
failure envelope for ice under multiaxial com-
Barnes, P.D., F.R.S. Tabor, and J.C.F. Walker (1971)
pressive stresses. Cold Regions Science and Technol-
The friction and creep of polycrystalline ice.
ogy, 12(1): 7582.
Proceedings, Royal Society of London, Ser. A. 347:
Nadreau, J.P., A.M. Nawwar, and Y.S. Wang (1991)
493512.
Triaxial testing of freshwater ice at low confining
Casassa, C., H. Narita, and N. Maeno (1991) Shear
pressures. Transactions of ASME, 113: 260265.
cell experiments of snow and ice friction. Journal
Reinicke, K.M., and T.D. Ralston (1977) Plastic
of Applied Physics, 69(6): 37453756.
limit analysis with an anisotropic, parabolic yield
Drucker, D.C., and W. Prager (1952) Soil mechan-
function. International Journal of Rock Mechanics
ics and plastic analysis of limit design. Quarterly
and Mining Sciences, 14(3): 147154.
Journal of Applied Mechanics, 10: 157165.
Richter-Menge, J.A., G.F.N. Cox, N. Perron, G.
Durell, and H.W. Bosworth (1986) Triaxial test-
under combined stress. USA Cold Regions Re-
ing of first-year sea ice. USA Cold Regions Re-
search and Engineering Laboratory, Special Re-
search and Engineering Laboratory, CRREL Re-
port 91-31.
port 86-16.
13
Previous Page
