Table 7. Effective sampling rates
cates for each of the three moisture conditions for
Ottawa sand at 23, 4, and -12C are presented in
(mL/min) for 2,4,6-TNT, 2,4-DNT,
2,6-DNT, and 1,3-DNB as a func-
Table 8. Similarly, mean concentrations for head-
tion of temperature.
space vapors for the silty and clayey soils at the
three temperatures are presented in Tables 9 and
23C
4C
12C
Compound
10, respectively. Because of the numbers of indi-
2,4,6-TNT
2.30
4.70
3.71
vidual treatment conditions in this experiment,
2,4-DNT
4.45*
5.50
10.3
we were unable to analyze individual replicates
2,6-DNT
4.05*
5.10
13.7
with the frequency needed to accurately establish
1,3-DNB
2.16*
†
†
the breakthrough times for the various vapors to
* Value obtained at 22C.
penetrate the soil barrier and be detectable in the
† No estimate for vapor pressure available.
headspace. Nevertheless, we did detect the pres-
ence of 2,4-DNT and 2,4,6-TNT in the headspace
Vapor concentrations of signature chemicals
above the sand and silt soils maintained at 23C
in soil headspace samples
Peak heights for the target analytes detected in
at day 6 for all three moisture levels, and at day 15
the soil headspace SPME samples were converted
above the clay for the two higher moisture levels.
At 4C, 2,4-DNT and 2,4,6-TNT were detected in
to mass (ng) using SARM-based standards pre-
pared in acetonitrile. Peak heights for 2,5-DNT
the vapor above the sand and silt for all three
and 3-5-DNT were converted to mass of analyte
moisture levels at 12 days. For the clay, 2,4-DNT
was detected at 19 days above the 4C samples,
recovered using the response factors for 2,4-DNT.
After locating a source for these analytes, we
but 2,4,6-TNT was not detected until day 67, and
made the standards and compared the detector
then only at the two higher moisture levels. For
the 12C samples, 2,4-DNT was detectable in the
response to the response for the 2,4-DNT stan-
dard. A response conversion factor was applied
headspace at day 13 above the sand and silt soils,
to 2,5-DNT and 3,5-DNT so that these analytes
but 2,4,6-TNT was not detected until day 173. For
the clay at 12C, only at day 173 was either 2,4-
could be expressed as their own concentrations.
Individual values for the vapor concentration of
DNT or 2,4,6-TNT detectable.
each target analyte in the two replicates for each
Figure 12 is a plot of the vapor concentrations
combination of soil type, moisture level, and tem-
of 2,4-DNT, 1,3-DNB, and 2,4,6-TNT in the head-
space above the silty soil at 23C (low moisture
perature for each day when samples were collect-
ed are presented in Appendix A, Tables A1A9.
added), as a function of time after the start of the
The mass of each target analyte detected in
experiment (4112 days); 2,4-DNT and 1,3-DNB
each headspace sample was converted to vapor
have the highest concentration of the target ana-
concentration (pg/mL) using the effective sam-
lytes throughout the study. For example, at 112
pling rates (mL/min), which were obtained as
days, 2,4-DNT was present in the headspace at
28.9 ng/L, and 1,3-DNB was present at 15.5 ng/L.
the sampling times (minutes) for each tempera-
In comparison, the vapor concentration of 2,4,6-
ture. The effective sampling rate for 2,4,6-TNT
TNT was only 2.65 ng/L after 112 days (Table 9).
(2.3 mL/min) was used to compute vapor con-
In the headspace above the Ottawa sand held at
23C, vapor concentrations of the target analytes
centrations for 2,4,6-TNT and other compounds
containing three nitro functions. The effective
exceeded those found above the silty soil by
sampling rate obtained for 2,4-DNT (4.5 mL/
about an order of magnitude (Table 8). For exam-
min) was used to estimate vapor concentrations
ple, the concentrations of 2,4-DNT, 1,3-DNB, and
of 2,4-DNT. Vapor concentrations for the other
2,4,6-TNT at 112 days in the low-moisture case
dinitro-containing compounds (DNTs and DNBs)
were 604, 401, and 135 ng/L, respectively. Con-
versely, for the clayey soil (low moisture, 23C),
were estimated from the mean effective sampling
rates measured for 2,4-DNT and 2,6-DNT (4.3
headspace concentrations were about an order of
mL/min). The effective sampling rate estimate
magnitude lower than for the silt. At 112 days, the
for 1,3-DNB was not used because we judged the
vapor concentrations of 2,4-DNT, 1,3-DNB, and
vapor pressure data that served as the basis for
2,4,6-TNT were 8.98, 1.68, and 0.24 ng/L, respec-
this value to be unreliable. These concentrations
tively (Table 10). These three analytes were gener-
for each headspace sample analyzed are presented
ally the target analytes present at highest concen-
in Tables A10A18.
tration in the headspace vapor above all three
soils maintained at 23C, although occasionally
Mean vapor concentrations for the two repli-
13
To Contents