INTRODUCTION - SR99_090007
INTRODUCTION - continued - SR99_090008
DEFICIENCIES WITH CURRENT METHODS AND OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY
RP-HPLC analyses
Miscellaneous variables - SR99_090011
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - SR99_090012
Response factors
Figure 3. Calibration curve obtained for RDX by GC-NPD analysis.
Figure 4. Calibration curve obtained for RDX by GC-ECD analysis.
Table 7. Comparison between GC-NPD and RP-HPLC results for the solvent extracts of field-contaminated soil samples.
Miscellaneous variables - SR99_090017
SUMMARY - SR99_090018
LITERATURE CITED - SR99_090019
LITERATURE CITED - continued - SR99_090020
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE - SR99_090021
SR99_09
INTRODUCTION - continued - SR99_090008
DEFICIENCIES WITH CURRENT METHODS AND OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY
RP-HPLC analyses
Miscellaneous variables - SR99_090011
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - SR99_090012
Response factors
Figure 3. Calibration curve obtained for RDX by GC-NPD analysis.
Figure 4. Calibration curve obtained for RDX by GC-ECD analysis.
Table 7. Comparison between GC-NPD and RP-HPLC results for the solvent extracts of field-contaminated soil samples.
Miscellaneous variables - SR99_090017
SUMMARY - SR99_090018
LITERATURE CITED - SR99_090019
LITERATURE CITED - continued - SR99_090020
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE - SR99_090021
SR99_09
