A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
13+00
13+00
12+00
Area
11+00
1N
Area 3
N
10+00
Site 30
9+00
Area 6
8+00
Area 1W
Area 4E
7+00
Area 2A
Area 4W
Site 20
Area 7
6+00
Site 10
Field Test
Area
Site 3
1S
5+00
Area
2S
Area 8
4+00
Area 10A
Area
Site 40
Area 6E
5A
3+00
Field Test
Site 1 Field Test Site 2
2+00
Area 9
1+00
Thermocouples
0+00
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
Figure 1. Raymark Superfund site map.
grid, one at center and one 1.5 m to each side of
center. Clegg hammer tests were done at 0.3-m
spacing along each of the three lines for a total of
1.5 m
153 points on each site. Dynamic cone penetrome-
ter testing was conducted at 1.5-m intervals along
each of the 15-m lines, for a total of 33 points per
site on both site 1 and site 3. The assumption is
made here that all three of the testing sites are rep-
0.3 m
resentative of the overall Raymark Superfund site,
and the results obtained are applicable to the over-
all site.
Because of the variability of the material on the
site, we determined that the analysis be based on
statistical examination of the field data. The 15-
15 m
3-m grids were selected to ensure adequate statis-
tical sampling. Selection of testing areas was based
on the availability of uncovered stabilized waste
material not designated for construction prior to
the close of the site for the winter. As shown on the
site map (Fig. 1), field test site 1 and 3 were located
in area 2A; field test site 2 was located in area 5A,
based on one specified area of uncovered stabi-
Raymark Super Fund Site
lized material.
Clegg Hammer Test Point
Initial test site locations were field test sites 1
Clegg & DCP Test Point
and 2. However, during preliminary DCP testing
at field test site 2, driving the DCP into the soil was
difficult, because of the soil's high strength, with-
out damaging the equipment. After consulting
1.5 m
with NED personnel, field test site 3 was selected
3m
as an alternative testing site. Even though DCP
testing was not possible on field test site 2, Clegg
hammer tests were completed.
Figure 2. Test site grid layout.
2
Previous Page
