Mercury intrusion porosimetry
results in graphical form. Appendix D presents
Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) is a new-
individual results from each sample tested.
er technique that determines the pore size distri-
bution in porous materials such as rock, concrete,
Microscopic examination of the air void system
and mortar. Its use with masonry is still a subject
A test method used to assess the susceptibility
of research. Samples from the specimens that
of porous materials to freezing and thawing is
were freezethaw-tested as described above were
ASTM C 457, "Standard Practice for Microscopical
also tested by mercury intrusion porosimetry.
Determination of Air-Void Content and Para-
Small samples were enclosed in a small test
meters of the Air-Void System in Hardened Con-
chamber capable of withstanding high pressures.
crete." Although this test method was developed
Mercury was injected into the chamber to fill the
for concrete, its principles may be used for other
air space available. Higher pressures are needed
concrete-like materials. The specimens are saw-cut
to intrude mercury into smaller pores. The pres-
slabs that are ground and polished and then
sure was increased gradually and the amount of
observed through a stereo microscope. The main
mercury that went into the chamber was record-
parameters of the test are the air content and the
ed. The pressure needed to intrude mercury was
spacing factor, an indication of the distance within
the cement paste that moisture must travel to
burn equation (Washburn 1921). The amount of
reach an unsaturated void to release hydraulic
mercury intruded at a given pressure range was
pressure during freezing. The test examines the
air-void parameters of the cement paste but fails to
pore size. The procedure for this test is described
include the characteristics of the aggregate. The
in ASTM D 4404, "Standard Test Method for De-
test is carried out under the assumption that the
termination of Pore Volume and Pore Volume
aggregate is freezethaw-durable. Experience
Distribution of Rock and Soil by Mercury Intru-
gained with structural concrete indicates that this
sion Porosimetry."
test can reasonably predict freezethaw suscepti-
Based on the documented mechanisms of
bility if the aggregate phase is freezethaw resis-
freezing of moisture in the pores of cement paste,
tant.
pore sizes can be classified in three ranges:
The most significant parameters shown in Table
1) Protective pores, larger than 5 m
9 are the spacing factor and the air content. (De-
tailed information is provided in Appendix E.) A
2) Capillary pores, from about 0.1 m to 5 m
small spacing factor is an indicator of durable ma-
3) Subcapillary pores smaller than 0.1 m.
terial. Spacing factors of less than 200 m indicate
Protective pores are usually benign because
factors above 250 m indicate frost susceptibility,
they provide reservoirs for excess moisture to
migrate to during freezing, thereby relieving
and values in between constitute a gray area. As
hydraulic pressure. Moisture in these voids can
explained above, this test method is concerned
freeze, but the voids are usually water-free be-
with the cement paste only. It ignores the charac-
cause neighboring capillary pores draw their
teristics of the aggregate. Although not included in
moisture away by suction. Capillary pores are
the standard test method, a brief description of the
small enough to generate high suction, which fills
aggregates used in the manufacture of each set of
them up, and large enough that the moisture in
specimens is included in Table 9 for reference.
Table 9. Test results from the microscopic examination of hard-
ened mortar.
Spacing
Specimen
Volume fractions (%)
factor
(m)
SRW* Aggregate Paste
Air
Aggregate description
A
52.6
31.0
16.4
143
Quartzite, sound
G
67.8
22.6
9.6
137
Sound, well graded, angular
H
67.3
28.2
4.5
212
Sound, well graded, angular
I
54.6
32.2
13.2
133
Coarse pores
J
60.2
32.2
7.6
271
Mostly porous and soft
K
51.9
35.2
12.9
106
Pumice with coarse vesicles
* SRW = Segmented retaining wall unit.
20