Acronyms - LR-04-190007
Executive Summary - LR-04-190008
Objectives of the Demonstration - LR-04-190009
Technology Description - LR-04-190010
Previous Testing of the Technology - LR-04-190011
Advantages and Limitations of the Technology - LR-04-190012
Advantages and Limitations of the Technology-continue
Available Treatability Guidance - LR-04-190014
Phytoremediation Technical and Regulatory Guidance Document - LR-04-190015
Demonstration Design - LR-04-190016
Selection of Test Sites
Test Site History and Characterization
Barrow - LR-04-190019
Physical Setup and Operation
Treatments and Soil Preparation
Analytical Procedures
Fraction-specific hydrocarbons (FSH)
Depletion Monitoring with a Selected Biomarker - LR-04-190024
Normalization with Respect to Climate
Performance Assessment - LR-04-190026
Plant Effects on Depletion of Specific Petroleum Fractions - LR-04-190027
Microbial Characterization - LR-04-190028
Performance Criteria
Phytoremediation
Approaches that Require Excavation of Soil
Table 4. Cost reporting: cleanup remediation technology
Cost Comparison
Implementation Issues - LR-04-190034
Lessons Learned
End-User Issues
Approach to Regulatory Compliance and Acceptance
References - LR-04-190038
Point of Contact - LR-04-190039
Appendix A. Chemical Analysis - LR-04-190040
GC Fingerprints TPH and PAH Degradation - LR-04-190041
Table 6. List of target analytes to be scanned for standard PAH analysis - LR-04-190042
The instrument conditions for the analysis-continue - LR-04-190043
Figure 2. Plant growth on Campion plots by late September 1999
Figure 4. Block 1 plots at Barrow in September 2000
Figure 6. Depiction of permafrost effects on contaminant sources and groundwater contamination
Figure 7. Cost versus time trade-off for remediation techniques
Figure 10. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data plant effects on TPH and summed PAHs
Figure 12. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data plant effects on aromatic fractions
Figure 14. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data significant fertilizer effects (inhibition)
Figure 15. Bacterial and fungal population changes over time at the Annette Island site
Figure 16. Bacterial populations in the non-fertilized and fertilized plots, and fungal populations in the non-vegetated and vegetated plots
Figure 17. Motor oil, cyclohexanol, and benzoic acid degrader numbers before and 10 months after treatments were implemented at the Annette Island site
LR-04-19
Executive Summary - LR-04-190008
Objectives of the Demonstration - LR-04-190009
Technology Description - LR-04-190010
Previous Testing of the Technology - LR-04-190011
Advantages and Limitations of the Technology - LR-04-190012
Advantages and Limitations of the Technology-continue
Available Treatability Guidance - LR-04-190014
Phytoremediation Technical and Regulatory Guidance Document - LR-04-190015
Demonstration Design - LR-04-190016
Selection of Test Sites
Test Site History and Characterization
Barrow - LR-04-190019
Physical Setup and Operation
Treatments and Soil Preparation
Analytical Procedures
Fraction-specific hydrocarbons (FSH)
Depletion Monitoring with a Selected Biomarker - LR-04-190024
Normalization with Respect to Climate
Performance Assessment - LR-04-190026
Plant Effects on Depletion of Specific Petroleum Fractions - LR-04-190027
Microbial Characterization - LR-04-190028
Performance Criteria
Phytoremediation
Approaches that Require Excavation of Soil
Table 4. Cost reporting: cleanup remediation technology
Cost Comparison
Implementation Issues - LR-04-190034
Lessons Learned
End-User Issues
Approach to Regulatory Compliance and Acceptance
References - LR-04-190038
Point of Contact - LR-04-190039
Appendix A. Chemical Analysis - LR-04-190040
GC Fingerprints TPH and PAH Degradation - LR-04-190041
Table 6. List of target analytes to be scanned for standard PAH analysis - LR-04-190042
The instrument conditions for the analysis-continue - LR-04-190043
Figure 2. Plant growth on Campion plots by late September 1999
Figure 4. Block 1 plots at Barrow in September 2000
Figure 6. Depiction of permafrost effects on contaminant sources and groundwater contamination
Figure 7. Cost versus time trade-off for remediation techniques
Figure 10. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data plant effects on TPH and summed PAHs
Figure 12. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data plant effects on aromatic fractions
Figure 14. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data significant fertilizer effects (inhibition)
Figure 15. Bacterial and fungal population changes over time at the Annette Island site
Figure 16. Bacterial populations in the non-fertilized and fertilized plots, and fungal populations in the non-vegetated and vegetated plots
Figure 17. Motor oil, cyclohexanol, and benzoic acid degrader numbers before and 10 months after treatments were implemented at the Annette Island site
LR-04-19
