Field Demonstration of Rhizosphere-Enhanced Treatment of Organics-Contaminated Soils on Native American Lands with Application to Northern FUD Sites
Introduction - LR-04-180012
The Benefits
Objectives of the Demonstration - LR-04-180014
Technology Description - LR-04-180015
Previous Testing of the Technology - LR-04-180016
Advantages and Limitations of the Technology - LR-04-180017
Weaknesses
Available Treatability Guidance - LR-04-180019
Phytoremediation Technical and Regulatory Guidance Document - LR-04-180020
Demonstration Design - LR-04-180021
Selecting Test Sites
Test Site Description - LR-04-180023
Campion / Galena
Barrow - LR-04-180025
Pre-Demonstration Testing and Analysis
Testing and Evaluation Plan
Operating Parameters for the Technology
Sampling Plan
Sample Collection - LR-04-180030
Sample Analysis
Depletion Monitoring with a Selected Biomarker - LR-04-180032
Selection of Analytical/Testing Methods
Performance Assessment - LR-04-180034
Table 2. Performance criteria
Data Analysis, Interpretation and Evaluation
Means and 95% Confidence Intervals
Results for One-Way ANOVA
Plant Effects on Depletion of Specific Petroleum Fractions - LR-04-180039
Microbial Characterization - LR-04-180040
Cost Assessment
Table 5. Cost reporting
Implementation Issues - LR-04-180043
Specifics for Implementing Rhizosphere-Enhanced Remediation at Northern Locations
Fertilizing: Rate
Monitoring: Sampling
References Cited in this Report
References Cited in this Report-continue
Point of Contact - LR-04-180049
Appendix A. Chemical Analysis - LR-04-180050
GC Fingerprints TPH and PAH Degradation - LR-04-180051
Table 6. List of target analytes to be scanned for standard PAH analysis - LR-04-180052
The instrument conditions for the analysis-continue - LR-04-180053
Appendix B. Plate Counts
Actinomycetes
Agar Preparation
Procedure - LR-04-180057
Clean-up Procedures - LR-04-180058
Appendix C. MPN Tubes
Materials - LR-04-180060
Procedure - LR-04-180061
Clean-up Procedures - LR-04-180062
Appendix D. List of Participants
Appendix D. List of Participants-continue
Native American Communities and Environmental Cleanup
Battelle (Contractor for Navy Site)
Appendix E. Data
Table 8. 17B(H),21a(H)-Hopane-normalized depletions at Barrow Site
Table 9. C3 Decalin-normalized depletions at Galena Site
Table 10. C3 Decalin- and growing-degree-day (GDD)-normalized depletions at Annette Site
Table 11. 17B(H),21a(H)-Hopane- and growing-degree-day(GDD)-normalized depletions at Barrow Site
Table 12. C3 Decalin- and growing-degree-day (GDD)-normalized depletions at Galena Site
Figure 1. Block of sample plots at Campion Air Force Station in August 1999
Figure 3. Cost versus time trade-off for remediation techniques
Figure 5. Map of Annette Island
Figure 6. Metlakatla Peninsula of Annette Island showing Annette Island Airport and tank farm
Figure 7. Annette Island Airport and tank farm
Figure 8. Annette Island site showing example of blocking approach used to reduce variability
Figure 9. Campion site plan
Figure 10. Detail of excavation work area at Campion.
Figure 11. Regional location map for the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory (NARL), Point Barrow, Alaska
Figure 12. Site features and extent of contamination at former bulk fuel tank farm at NARL, Point Barrow
Figure 14. Block 1 plots at Barrow in September 2000
Figure 17. Typical GC fingerprint for gasoline
Figure 20. Typical GC fingerprint for the heavy fuel, fuel oil no. 4
Figure 22. Histogram for three ESTCP Field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data - aliphatic fractions
Figure 23. Histogram for three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data - aromatic fractions
Figure 26. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data aliphatic fractions
Figure 27. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data aromatic fractions
Figure 30. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data plant effects on aromatic fractions
Figure 32. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data fertilizer effects on TPH and summed PAHs
Figure 34. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data fertilizer effects on aromatic fractions
Figure 35. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data significant fertilizer effects (inhibition)
Figure 36. Bacterial and fungal population changes over time at the Annette Island site
Figure 37. Bacterial populations in the non-fertilized and fertilized plots, and fungal populations in the non-vegetated and vegetated plots
Figure 38. Motor oil, cyclohexanol, and benzoic acid degrader numbers before and 10 months after treatments were implemented at the Annette Island site
Figure 39. Changes in fungal biomarkers at the Barrow site
LR-04-18
Introduction - LR-04-180012
The Benefits
Objectives of the Demonstration - LR-04-180014
Technology Description - LR-04-180015
Previous Testing of the Technology - LR-04-180016
Advantages and Limitations of the Technology - LR-04-180017
Weaknesses
Available Treatability Guidance - LR-04-180019
Phytoremediation Technical and Regulatory Guidance Document - LR-04-180020
Demonstration Design - LR-04-180021
Selecting Test Sites
Test Site Description - LR-04-180023
Campion / Galena
Barrow - LR-04-180025
Pre-Demonstration Testing and Analysis
Testing and Evaluation Plan
Operating Parameters for the Technology
Sampling Plan
Sample Collection - LR-04-180030
Sample Analysis
Depletion Monitoring with a Selected Biomarker - LR-04-180032
Selection of Analytical/Testing Methods
Performance Assessment - LR-04-180034
Table 2. Performance criteria
Data Analysis, Interpretation and Evaluation
Means and 95% Confidence Intervals
Results for One-Way ANOVA
Plant Effects on Depletion of Specific Petroleum Fractions - LR-04-180039
Microbial Characterization - LR-04-180040
Cost Assessment
Table 5. Cost reporting
Implementation Issues - LR-04-180043
Specifics for Implementing Rhizosphere-Enhanced Remediation at Northern Locations
Fertilizing: Rate
Monitoring: Sampling
References Cited in this Report
References Cited in this Report-continue
Point of Contact - LR-04-180049
Appendix A. Chemical Analysis - LR-04-180050
GC Fingerprints TPH and PAH Degradation - LR-04-180051
Table 6. List of target analytes to be scanned for standard PAH analysis - LR-04-180052
The instrument conditions for the analysis-continue - LR-04-180053
Appendix B. Plate Counts
Actinomycetes
Agar Preparation
Procedure - LR-04-180057
Clean-up Procedures - LR-04-180058
Appendix C. MPN Tubes
Materials - LR-04-180060
Procedure - LR-04-180061
Clean-up Procedures - LR-04-180062
Appendix D. List of Participants
Appendix D. List of Participants-continue
Native American Communities and Environmental Cleanup
Battelle (Contractor for Navy Site)
Appendix E. Data
Table 8. 17B(H),21a(H)-Hopane-normalized depletions at Barrow Site
Table 9. C3 Decalin-normalized depletions at Galena Site
Table 10. C3 Decalin- and growing-degree-day (GDD)-normalized depletions at Annette Site
Table 11. 17B(H),21a(H)-Hopane- and growing-degree-day(GDD)-normalized depletions at Barrow Site
Table 12. C3 Decalin- and growing-degree-day (GDD)-normalized depletions at Galena Site
Figure 1. Block of sample plots at Campion Air Force Station in August 1999
Figure 3. Cost versus time trade-off for remediation techniques
Figure 5. Map of Annette Island
Figure 6. Metlakatla Peninsula of Annette Island showing Annette Island Airport and tank farm
Figure 7. Annette Island Airport and tank farm
Figure 8. Annette Island site showing example of blocking approach used to reduce variability
Figure 9. Campion site plan
Figure 10. Detail of excavation work area at Campion.
Figure 11. Regional location map for the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory (NARL), Point Barrow, Alaska
Figure 12. Site features and extent of contamination at former bulk fuel tank farm at NARL, Point Barrow
Figure 14. Block 1 plots at Barrow in September 2000
Figure 17. Typical GC fingerprint for gasoline
Figure 20. Typical GC fingerprint for the heavy fuel, fuel oil no. 4
Figure 22. Histogram for three ESTCP Field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data - aliphatic fractions
Figure 23. Histogram for three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data - aromatic fractions
Figure 26. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data aliphatic fractions
Figure 27. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data aromatic fractions
Figure 30. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data plant effects on aromatic fractions
Figure 32. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data fertilizer effects on TPH and summed PAHs
Figure 34. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data fertilizer effects on aromatic fractions
Figure 35. Three ESTCP field sites - decalin and GDD normalized data significant fertilizer effects (inhibition)
Figure 36. Bacterial and fungal population changes over time at the Annette Island site
Figure 37. Bacterial populations in the non-fertilized and fertilized plots, and fungal populations in the non-vegetated and vegetated plots
Figure 38. Motor oil, cyclohexanol, and benzoic acid degrader numbers before and 10 months after treatments were implemented at the Annette Island site
Figure 39. Changes in fungal biomarkers at the Barrow site
LR-04-18
