Table 4. Analysis of ice jam potential for the Missouri River near the BufordTrenton Irrigation
District.
Calculated
ice
Snow-
Garrison
Known FDD thickness
FDDmax
Qmax
QmaxFDDmax
Qb
fall
Snow stage
jam (F-days)
Σ+
Σ
Σ
Year
(in.)
(J.D.)
(J.D.)
(days)
(Kcfs) (in.) timing* (ft)
2750++†
1952
X
31
178+
180+
2++
124.0 25
E
Low
6
3
2.0
1960
2000
27
165
174
9
100.0
15
1798.0
1
4
0.25
1970
2030
27
182+
160
22
26.5
38
L+
1837.0
2
2
1.00
1971
2444
30
177+
166
11
58.0+ 18
L+
1842.0+
4
4
1.00
1972
X
2600++
31
160
167
7++
75.0
33
1844.0+
5
0
1973
1650
24
147
157
10
30.0+
7
E
1843.2+
2
6
0.33
1974
2260
29
180+
186+
6++
31.0+ 20
1838.8
5
0
1975
X
1800
25
180+
175+
5++
30.0+ 48++
L+
1838.6
8
0
1976
X
1800
25
165
175+
10
43.0+ 28
E
1840.5+
3
1
3.00
1977
1900
26
140
170
30
25.0
15
E
1836.0
0
6
--
1978
X
3000++
33
170+
176+
6++
87/0
15
E
1828.0
6
4
1.50
1979
3300++
34
180+
170
10
60.0+ 37
L+
1835.5
5
1
2.50
1980
1900
26
165
151
14
26.0
25
1837.6
0
3
--
1981
1100
20
135
145
10
28.0
5
E
1829.9
0
8
--
1982
2300
29
160
147
13
40.0+ 60++
L+
1829.2
4
4
1.00
1983
1422
23
174+
166
8
21.0 29
VL+ 1841.1+
3
3
1.00
1984
1960
27
168+
174+
6++
19.5
30
L+
1839.1
5
1
5.00
1985
2307
29
158
156
2++
25.0
18
L+
1838.4
3
3
1.00
1986
X
2000
27
145
152
7++
59.5+ 35
L+
1836.3
4
2
2.00
1987
1018
19
179+
168
11
17.0
16
E
1840.3+
2
6
0.33
1988
1517
23
167+
176+
9
17.0 16
E
1832.9
2
7
0.29
1989
2300
29
175+
167
8
40.5+ 32
E
1820.7
2
2
1.00
26.0 <18
1992
918
18
147
158
11
E
1821.5
0
9
--
* E = early, L = late, VL = very late.
† + = high correlation with ice jamming, = lower correlation with ice jamming.
the total snowfall for the season and the timing of
greater, more rapid discharge increase to initiate
the snowfall, as an indicator. The timing of the
breakup.
snowfall is listed as being E for early, L for late or
As mentioned previously, it takes a certain
VL for very late. The climate of the Williston area is
magnitude of discharge and stage increase to re-
such that, in many years, the snow has completely
lease an ice cover and allow it to move down-
melted from the river ice surface prior to breakup.
stream. If the increase in discharge is rapid or the
In addition to potential thinning of the ice cover
ice is deteriorated, the required increase in stage
through thermal melting, this allows solar radia-
may be slight, but for gradually rising discharges
tion to penetrate and decay the internal structure
the required increase in stage may be equivalent
of the ice. In this manner, even a relatively thick ice
to three or four ice thicknesses. For the typical
cover can be weakened to reduce or eliminate the
freezeup and midwinter discharge of about 10,000
cfs in the study area, a spring runoff event in ex-
A factor is also included in the table to reflect
cess of 25,000 cfs should be required to break up a
the elevation of Lake Sakakawea (Garrison Reser-
strong ice cover. The required breakup discharge
voir stage), since the most common location for ice
(Qb) varies, however, with the actual freezeup dis-
jam formation is the transition from a steeper to a
charge for a given year, as well as variations in the
milder energy slope such as that presented by a
other terms listed in Table 4. At very high dis-
river flowing into a lake or reservoir. Garrison Res-
charges, greater than about 90,000 cfs, no stable ice
ervoir reached its normal operating levels in 1965
jams would be able to form. The situation would
and since that time has been a potential factor in
then revert to an open-water flood scenario.
the occurrence and location of ice jam formation.
Two terms are included to account for snowfall
characteristics. Ideally the snow-related portion of
various terms, an effort was made to discriminate
the prediction scheme would use the depth of
whether the values indicated a high, medium or
snow remaining on the ground prior to breakup
low potential for ice-related flooding. The criteria
as an index, but historic records of this parameter
for ranking the terms are provided in Table 5.
are not available. Instead we have used two terms,
15