Table 2. Ice sample properties.
Bulk
Air
Brine Poros-
Thicknessb
salinityb
Densityc
volumed
volumed ityd
Accretion
Accretion
Samplea
(Mg m3 )
surface
orientation
(cm)
(‰)
(%)
(%)
(%)
0.895 at 9.3C
F1
Deck
Horizontal
3.2
24.0
5.5
13.7
19.2
0.888 at 6.6C
F2
Deck
Horizontal
2.8
21.1
6.2
15.8
22.0
0.768 at 7.5C
F3
Bulkhead
Vertical
1.6
14.7
18.0
8.5
26.5
0.762 at 7.8C
F4
Bulkhead
Vertical
1.6
14.1
18.6
7.9
26.5
0.823 at 8.5C
F5
Bulkhead
Vertical
2.0
13.0
11.9
7.3
19.2
0.917 at 8.0Ce
DTMB hatchf
F6
Horizontal
1.8
24.2
3.3
15.9
19.2
0.773 at 8.0Ce
F7
5-in. gun
Vertical
2.8
16.2
17.6
9.0
26.6
0.718 at 8.0Ce
F8
5-in. gun
Vertical
3.0
13.7
23.2
7.1
30.3
0.693 at 8.0Ce
DTMB bulkheadf
Vertical
1.9
11.5
25.7
5.7
31.4
F9
M1
Deck
Horizontal
0.6
24.9
--
--
--
--
M2
Deck
Horizontal
0.6
25.4
--
--
--
--
0.848 at 2.2C
M3
5-in. gun
Vertical
1.1
14.8
11.3
30.1
41.4
M4
Life line
Hanging
--
16.7
--
--
--
--
0.871 at~1.6C
g
g
g
M5
5-in. gun
Vertical
0.6
10.3
0.799 at~1.6C
g
g
g
M6
5-in. gun
Vertical
0.8
7.9
0.872 at~1.6C
g
g
g
M7
5-in. gun
Vertical
1.2
8.6
0.868 at 2.4C
M8
Deck
Horizontal
4.4
16.2
9.3
30.8
40.1
0.877 at 3.0C
M9
5-in. gun
Vertical
2.3
7.5
6.0
11.5
17.5
0.882 at 3.0C
M10
5-in. gun
Vertical
3.4
7.0
5.3
10.8
16.1
M11
Life line
Hanging
--
11.8
--
--
--
--
M12
5-in. gun icicles
Hanging
--
14.2
--
--
--
--
0.865 at 1.6C
M13
Deck
Horizontal
2.4
13.7
10.3
40.1
50.4
0.827 at 2.8C
M14
5-in. gun
Vertical
1.1
9.8
12.0
15.2
27.2
aSample
identifier (Fig. 8).
bThickness
and salinity measured at CRREL.
cTemperature of ice measured in situ during sampling on USCGC Midgett. See Figure 7 for air temperatures during
sampling. Density measured at CRREL.
dComputed volume of entrapped air and brine, and total porosity at shipboard ice temperature (after Cox and Weeks 1983).
eSample temperatures were estimated from the mean of other ice temperatures in same sample period.
fExperimental ice removal panels installed by the U.S. Navy David Taylor Model Basin atop main hatch cover and on portion
of starboard forward bulkhead.
gTemperature not known with sufficient accuracy for computations.
caused by changes in air temperature and seawater ther-
sanding to a thickness of 1.2 to 3.2 cm, finished samples
containing about 50 to 340 cm3 of ice. Each sample
mal flux, suggest that superstructure icing is not a simple
was measured with digital calipers to 0.02-mm accu-
accretion process, but a series of accretionablation
racy at three locations in each dimension, and its vol-
episodes related to the thermally limited, mass limited,
ume was computed from the mean of each dimension.
and maximum accretion zones discussed earlier in this
Ice mass was measured to the nearest 0.01 g, and den-
report and by Ackley (1985). These accretionablation
sity was computed on the basis of the measured masses
sub-events are likely to influence ice physical proper-
and volumes of the samples. It is estimated that densi-
ties and crystallography.
ties are correct within 1% of their true values at the
measurement temperature.
ICE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Ice density, coupled with thickness, determines the
mass of ice at various locations on the ship, and has a
Density
large effect upon the ultimate strength of the ice and
how well it adheres to the substrate (Smirnov 1972).
Ice used for measuring density and salinity was sec-
tioned from the larger samples removed from the ship.
Ice densities measured during the February and March
icing events ranged from 0.69 to 0.92 Mg m3 (Table
A bandsaw was used to cut the samples into rectangu-
lar slabs with sufficient width and length to yield, after
2). Ice densities on horizontal surfaces were 1.2 times
11
to contents