A second-order polynomial equation was fit-
We recommend that additional studies be
done to evaluate the TDR response from a range
ted to the concrete data as shown in Figure 4. Also
of concretes. The concrete should include low to
high paste contents and small to large aggregates.
gests that we can be confident that 95% of the
time a dielectric constant measured with TDR
will be within this envelope. At best, this band is
LITERATURE CITED
within 1/2% of the curve fitted to the data. The
curve for concrete covers a range of water con-
Ansoult, M., L.W . DeBacker, and M. Declercq
tents from 4 to 11%. However, until studies on
(1984) Statistical relationship between apparent
other concretes are conducted, the following
dielectric constant and water content in porous
equation is considered usable only for the partic-
media. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America,
ular concrete used in this study:
48: 4750.
Fellner-Feldegg, J. (1969) The measurement of di-
ω = 0.0001928K 2 + 1.146K 4.425
(3)
electrics in the time domain. Journal of Physical
where ω is volumetric water content (%), and K is
Chemistry, 73: 616623.
the dielectric constant.
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (1977) 58th
Edition, Cleveland, Ohio: Chemical Rubber Com-
pany Press.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Lange's Handbook of Chemistry (1973) Eleventh
Edition (J.A. Dean, Ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
A relationship between the dielectric constant
Mindess, S., and J. F. Young (1981) Concrete. Engle-
and water content of a concrete has been devel-
wood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
oped. This relationship, a second-order polyno-
Mironov, S.A. (1977) Theory and methods of win-
mial, is considered valid for the Denver Interna-
ter concreting. USA Cold Regions Research and
tional Airport concrete pavement. The equation,
Engineering Laboratory, Draft Translation 636.
shown above, is appropriate for volumetric water
contents between 11 and 4% (5 to 2%, gravimet-
Press, W.H., B.P. Flannery, S.A. Teukolsky, and
ric), which encompass a wide range of pavement
W.T. Vetterling (1986) Numerical Recipes: The Art of
field conditions. Because the results showed that
Scientific Computing. New York: Cambridge Uni-
the TDR readings were different between mortar
versity Press.
and concrete and that aggregate size may affect
Topp, G. C., J. L. Davis, and A. P. Annan (1980)
readings, a family of curves may be more appro-
Electromagnetic determination of soil water con-
priate for concrete. Thus, we hesitate to recom-
tent: Measurement in coaxial transmission lines.
mend these results for other concretes until addi-
Water Resources Research, 16(3): 574582.
tional studies are done on concretes of other mix-
7