Table 2 (cont'd). Resilient modulus samples tested.
Class 3 Subbase
Class 6 Base Course
Dry density
Water content
Dry density Water content
Mg/m3 (lb/ft3)
Mg/m3 (lb/ft3)
No.
(% by wt)
No.
(% by wt)
Thawed
Thawed
CE 55 Compactive effort
CE 55 Compactive effort
Class 3-1
2.11 (131.5)
7.2
Class 6-2
2.08 (130.0)
9.6
2.12 (132.1)
3.3
2.08 (130.0)
6.0
2.12 (132.3)
0.8
Class 6-3
2.06 (128.4)
10.1
Class 3-2R
2.13 (132.7)
5.1
2.06 (128.4)
8.9
2.12 (132.6)
3.2
2.09 (130.7)
7.3
2.12 (132.3)
0.8
Class 6-4
2.09 (130.6)
9.5
Class 3-3
2.09 (130.4)
8.3
2.09 (130.6)
7.5
2.10 (131.2)
6.7
2.14 (133.8)
7.2
2.10 (130.9)
2.1
2.14 (133.8)
6.5
2.10 (131.4)
1.4
Class 6-5
2.06 (128.7)
9.3
Class 3-4
2.08 (129.6)
9.3
2.06 (128.7)
7.1
2.09 (129.8)
7.9
2.05 (128.2)
5.1
2.09 (130.5)
4.0
2.05 (128.2)
4.8
2.10 (131.0)
2.4
2.10 (131.0)
2.4
Class 6-6
2.13 (133.1)
8.9
Frozen
Class 3-1
2.06 (128.3)
7.6
2.18 (136.0)
4.9
Class 3-2
2.09 (130.7)
6.2
2.18 (136.0)
4.4
Class 3-3
2.03 (126.5)
9.3
2.14 (133.3)
1.6
Class 3-4
2.02 (125.8)
10.1
2.14 (133.8)
0.7
Class 6-9
2.10 (134.2)
8.2
2.08 (136.2)
7.0
2.06 (136.2)
6.1
2.09 (136.2)
5.4
2.17 (135.3)
4.0
2.17 (135.3)
1.4
2.18 (136.3)
0.5
Frozen
Class 6-1
2.10 (130.9)
9.4
Class 6-2
2.08 (130.0)
9.6
Class 6-3
2.06 (128.4)
10.1
Class 6-4
2.09 (130.6)
9.5
Class 6-6
2.13 (133.1)
8.9
Class 6-9
2.15 (134.2)
8.2
The specimen was first positioned on one of the
over the first to protect the multi-VITs. The remain-
cell bases with an aluminum cap placed on top.
der of the instrumentation was then attached to
It was then encased in a thin latex membrane with
the specimen and cell in the necessary positions.
O-rings at the top and bottom. The aluminum foil
Once the cell was assembled, the specimen was
targets for the multi-VITs were secured to this first
tested in repeated-load triaxial compression using
membrane, then a second membrane was placed
a closed-loop, electrohydraulic testing machine.
4
Previous Page
