Table 3. Cryogenic frost
sample subgroup and prorating their test results to
damage to two groups of 10
fit the main sample. We picked the latter approach,
aggregate samples in order
as it would provide more potentially useful infor-
of decreasing durability.
mation.
Absorption readings were obtained by selecting
Percent
Percent
pieces of aggregate, four from each sample sub-
Sample
passing Sample passing
group (e.g., four from each of the igneous, meta-
3666
0.08
3989
0.03
morphic and sedimentary carbonate groups were
4205
0.10
4015
0.40
tested from sample 3704) and placing them in a wire
3704
1.07
3987
0.60
3791
1.13
3990
0.76
basket that was submerged in water and suspended
3632
1.43
4014
0.89
from a scale. The weight of water absorbed was
4206
1.53
3991
1.69
recorded every minute. Immediately following each
3593
2.49
3992
1.80
recording, the four pieces of aggregate were mo-
3595
3.94
4033
2.35
mentarily removed from the water to dislodge at-
4204
33.31
4141
2.74
4130
48.44
3035
2.91
tached air bubbles.
The resulting weight readings were corrected to
minute cycle. After 10 cycles the aggregate was
account for differences in aggregate size. When
oven dried at 105C and resieved.
water is absorbed into an aggregate, the weight ab-
sorbed at any time is proportional to surface area.
ported in Table 3 as the percentage of original
Thus, for similar materials, absorption rates in larg-
weight passing a 5/8-in. sieve. Loss attributable to
er aggregates having smaller surface-to-volume
the mechanical action of sieving was monitored by
ratios might be different from smaller ones having
sieving a control sample not subjected to freezing
larger ratios. To correct for differences in surface
and thawing.
area, each reading was divided by the surface area
of the four aggregates being tested. (Surface area
was estimated, based on spherical geometry, using
Absorption
Aggregates contain a system of absorptive and
weight and specific gravity data developed during
nonabsorptive pores. The absorptive pores are
the mercury intrusion testing.)
similar to the capillary pores found in hardened
The corrected weight readings were then adjust-
cement paste; they are filled with water by capil-
ed to make them representative of the entire aggre-
lary suction. The nonabsorptive pores are like
gate sample. Each subgroup result was weighted,
entrained air cavities in concrete that can only be
according to its portion represented in the overall
filled by removing the entrapped air and applying
sample, and added to the weighted results of the
an external pressure. The rate at which absorptive
other subgroups from the same sample.
space fills with water provides information about
Thus, all recorded weight data were corrected to
frost-susceptibility. Fine pores of high capillarity
account for surface area variations and adjusted on
usually acquire water more quickly than coarse
a weighted basis to be representative of the entire
pores of low capillarity. Since freezing water caus-
sample. Figure 1 shows how quickly each sample
es distress, aggregate that wets easily and retains
absorbed water when submerged. For example,
moisture strongly is usually more frost-suscepti-
within the first 6 minutes, samples 3666, 3791, 3595,
ble than aggregate that wets slowly and drains
4205 and 4206 achieved nearly 10% of their 24-hour
readily. Modules II and III addressed the total
saturation, indicating that they might have a rela-
absorptive capacity of each aggregate sample by
tively fine pore structure (high capillarity). The
measuring their 1-day through 1-year absorptions.
seemingly coarser grained aggregates showed a
This study examined the initial rate of absorption
more gradual absorption rate. Samples 4130 and
during the first several minutes of wetting as well
4204, the slags, appear to have the coarsest pore
as the 24-hour absorption. For reasons discussed
structure. Table 4 ranks the aggregates by fill rate
from the fastest to slowest based on the 6th minute
earlier, our absorption measurements were made
on only half the materials; in this case, those from
reading and gives their 24-hour absorptions.
the first 10 samples.
Our main problem was obtaining a single ab-
Crushing value
sorption value for each sample. Two approaches
An aggregate's strength and freezethaw dura-
were considered: either constructing a small sam-
bility are both influenced by its internal pore struc-
ture. As freezing occurs, damage progresses from
ple having the identical makeup of the main sam-
internal micro-fissures into larger and larger cracks.
ple, or selecting individual aggregates from each
4