Fluid Pressure
Texture
Alleviation
Pavement
Micro
Macro
Viscous
Dynamic
Low
Low
Poor
Poor
Smooth
Low
Medium
Poor
Good
Smooth Stones
High
Low
Excellent
Poor
Sandpapery
High
Medium
Excellent
Good
Fractured Stones
Low
High
Fair
Excellent
Grooves
Figure 15. Pavement surface charac-
High
High
Excellent
Excellent
Grooves
teristics.
Medium
High
Good
Excellent
Porous
80
3). However, it is important at all speeds and is a
ond, the use of rounded coarse or fine aggregates
60
5
and 4 in Figure 16).
Several laboratory tests are available to study
40
the change in macro- and microtextures under
3
repeated loading in the laboratory. Methods for
measuring texture can be categorized into volu-
20
4
metric, profile, topography, contact, drainage,
and miscellaneous measurements (Rose et al.
1
2
1972). Brief descriptions of some of the tests are
0
provided here. Details and references to these
0
20
40
60
80
and other devices can be found in Rose et al.
Speed, mph
(1972).
It must be realized that different test methods
1
Smooth
produce different results. It may not be possible
to correlate results from one test to another. The
2
Fine Textured, Rounded
most common test used today for determining
the macrotexture depth is the sand patch test,
3
Fine Textured, Gritty
described in the next subsection.
Volumetric measurements are commonly used
4
Coarse Textured, Rounded
for macrotexture depth determinations. These
include the sand patch, modified sand patch,
5
Coarse Textured, Gritty
vibrating sand patch, sand track, grease smear,
and silicone putty tests. These tests differ in the
Figure 16. Effect of pavement texture on skid
resistance.
11
to contents