Fabrizio, M.C., A.M. Frank and J.F. Savino (1995)
Parrish, R.S., G.O. Ware, C.N. Smith and P.A.
Procedures for formation of composite samples
Banks (1990) Composite sampling techniques for
from segmented populations. Environmental Sci-
determining pesticide concentrations. In Proceed-
ence Technology, 29: 11371144.
ings of the 1990 Kansas State University Conference
on Applied Statistics in Agriculture (G.A. Milliken
Garner, F.C., M.A. Stapanian and L.R. Williams
(1988) Composite sampling for environmental
and J.R. Schwenke, Eds.). Manhattan, Kansas: De-
monitoring. In Principles of Environmental Sampling
partment of Statistics, Kansas State University, p.
(L.H. Keith, Ed.). Washington, D.C.: American
2132.
Chemical Society, p. 363374.
Sabbe, W .E. and D.B. Marx (1987) Soil sampling:
Gilbert, R.O. (1987) Statistical Methods for Envi-
Spatial and temporal variability. In Soil Testing:
ronmental Pollution Monitoring, 1st
Edition. New
York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
tion (J.R. Brown, Ed.). SSSA Special Publication,
Huesemann, M.H. (1994) Guidelines for the de-
no. 21. Madison, Wisconsin: SSSA, p. 114.
velopment of effective statistical soil sampling
Schaeffer, D.J., H.W . Kerster and K.G. Janardan
strategies for environmental applications. In Hy-
(1980) Grab versus composite sampling: A primer
for the manager and engineer. Environmental Man-
Calabrese and P.T. Kostecki, Ed.), Vol. 4, Chap. 4.
agement, 4: 157163.
Amherst, Massachusetts: Association for the En-
Smith, F., S. Kulkarni, L.E. Myers and M.J.
vironmental Health of Soils, p. 4796.
Jenkins, T.F. and S.M. Golden (1993) Develop-
ity assurance sampling data. In Principles of Envi-
ment of an improved confirmation separation suit-
ronmental Sampling (L.H. Keith, Ed.). Washington,
able for use with SW846 Method 8330. USA Cold
D.C.: American Chemical Society, p. 157168.
Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory,
Starr, J.L., T.B. Parkin and J.J. Meisinger (1995)
Special Report 93-14.
Influence of sample size on chemical and physi-
Jenkins, T.F. and M.E. Walsh (1991) Field Screen-
cal soil measurements. Soil Science Society of
ing Method for 2,4-Dinitrotoluene in Soil. USA
America Journal, 59: 713719.
Cold Regions Research and Engineering Labora-
Thorne, P.G. and T.F. Jenkins (1995) Develop-
tory, Special Report 91-17.
ment of a field method for quantifying ammo-
Jenkins, T.F. and M.E. Walsh (1992) Development
nium picrate and picric acid in soil and water.
of field screening methods for TNT, 2,4-DNT, and
USA Cold Regions Research and Engineering
RDX in soil. Talanta, 39: 419428.
Laboratory, Special Report 95-20.
Triegel, E.K. (1988) Sampling variability in soils
Jenkins, T.F., P.W . Schumacher, J.G. Mason and
P.G. Thorne (1996) On-site analysis for high con-
and solid wastes. In Principles of Environmental
centrations of explosives in soil: Extraction kinet-
Sampling (L.H. Keith, Ed.). Washington, D.C.:
ics and dilution procedures. USA Cold Regions
American Chemical Society, p. 385394.
Research and Engineering Laboratory, Special Re-
Triegel, E.K., L. Guo and S. Ward (1994) Cost-
port 96-10.
effective sampling approaches. Presented at Ameri-
can Chemical Society Symposium of Principles of En-
Keith, L.H., G.L. Patton, D.L. Lewis, P.G. Edwards
and M.A. Re (1995) A new calculation tool for
vironmental Sampling, 16 March 1994, San Diego,
estimating numbers of samples. In Proceedings of
California.
the Eleventh Annual Waste Testing and Quality As-
van Ee, J.J., L.J. Blume and T.H. Starks (1990) A
surance Symposium, July 2328, Washington D.C.,
rationale for the assessment of errors in the sam-
p. 550564,
pling of soils. Las Vegas, Nevada: Environmental
Paasivirta, J. and R. Paukku (1989) Use of com-
Monitoring Systems Laboratory, EPA/600/4-90/
posited samples to optimize the monitoring of
013.
environmental toxins. Chemosphere, 19: 15511562.
Williams, L.R. (1996) Criteria-based approach for
Parkin, T.B. (1987) Soil microsites as a source of
solicitation and selection of field-measurement
denitrification variability. Soil Science Society of
technologies. American Environmental Laboratory,
America Journal, 51: 11941199.
8(2): 3637.
38