Table 3 (cont'd). Concentration (g/L) of metals
Table 4. Mean normalized concentrations of met-
found leaching from well casings.
als leaching from well casings.*
Contact time, days
h. Silver
Treatment
1
5
20
40
BARIUM
Contact time, days
Treatment
1
5
20
40
PVC
1.85
1.55
1.29
1.08
PTFE
1.44
1.57
0.78
1.20
CONTROL
LD
0.047
0.019
LD
FEP
1.33
1.47
5.90
1.44
CONTROL
0.011
LD
0.064
LD
FRE
1.68
1.34
1.05
1.60
CONTROL
LD
LD
LD
LD
FRP
1.16
1.36
1.41
1.38
X
<0.010
<0.022
<0.031
<0.010
CADMIUM
% RSD
--
--
--
--
≈1.0
PVC
>1.5
>2.5
>4.4
PVC
0.015
LD
LD
≈1.0
PTFE
>1.4
>1.4
>1.6
PVC
0.028
0.019
LD
0.048
≈1.2
FEP
>2.4
>1.9
>3.0
PVC
LD
LD
0.028
0.021
FRE
>3.6
>3.9
>4.8
>3.9
X
<0.018
<0.013
<0.016
<0.026
FRP
>9.0
>11
>13
>14
% RSD
--
--
--
--
PTFE
LD
LD
LD
0.043
≈1.4
≈1.0
≈1.5
≈1.0
PVC
PTFE
LD
0.010
LD
LD
≈1.8
≈1.0
≈1.0
≈1.0
PTFE
PTFE
LD
LD
0.059
LD
≈1.2
≈1.0
≈1.2
≈1.7
FEP
X
<0.010
<0.010
<0.026
<0.021
FRE
>5.7
>2.8
>2.4
>4.3
% RSD
--
--
--
--
FRP
>6.0
>2.4
>2.0
>1.4
COPPER
FEP
0.040
LD
0.014
0.033
FEP
LD
LD
LD
0.079
PVC
0.88
0.76
0.63
0.68
FEP
0.051
LD
LD
LD
PTFE
0.99
0.95
0.97
0.98
X
<0.034
<0.010
<0.011
<0.041
FEP
0.91
0.83
0.84
0.80
% RSD
--
--
--
--
FRE
0.56
0.56
0.46
0.42
FRP
0.74
0.62
0.55
0.49
FRE
0.040
0.031
LD
LD
LEAD
FRE
LD
LD
LD
0.025
≈1.0
≈1.0
≈1.4
≈1.2
FRE
0.037
LD
0.060
LD
PVC
≈2.3
≈1.0
≈1.0
X
<0.029
<0.017
<0.027
<0.015
PTFE
>1.5
≈1.1
≈1.0
% RSD
--
--
--
--
FEP
>2.4
>1.8
≈1.2
≈1.0
≈1.0
≈1.0
FRE
FRP
LD
LD
LD
LD
FRP
>34
>29
>22
>28
FRP
LD
0.050
0.018
LD
NICKEL
FRP
LD
LD
LD
LD
≈1.1
X
<0.010
<0.023
<0.013
<0.010
PVC
>1.2
>1.3
1.4
% RSD
--
--
--
--
PTFE
>1.3
>1.4
>1.2
1.1
FEP
>1.8
>1.5
>1.3
1.7
LD Values less than MDL.
FRE
>3.0
>2.2
>2.3
2.1
FRP
>3.4
>2.8
>2.7
2.1
ZINC
ceeded the MCL of 15 g/L set by the US EPA
PVC
2.2
3.48
2.84
3.22
PTFE
1.96
1.74
2.17
1.94
(1994) for drinking water, although the mean val-
FEP
1.78
2.01
1.68
1.63
ues for each day and material were below this
FRE
2.35
3.24
2.28
3.08
limit. For samples exposed to the other materials,
FRP
6.86
11.5
7.34
8.48
concentrations were well below the MCL. Con-
* The mean normalized concentration was determined by
centrations were always less than 2 g/L and gen-
dividing the mean concentration of a given analyte at a given
erally were less than 1 g/L.
time and for a particular casing material by the mean con-
centration (for the same analyte) of the control sample taken
Lead concentrations in the samples exposed to
at the same time.
FRP were much higher than Hewitt (1989) ob-
The mean normalized concentrations for samples where
one or more values for the controls were less than the MDL
served for samples exposed to SS 304 and 316
are marked with >.
under similar conditions. The other materials
In cases where one or more values for the sample are also
(PVC, PTFE, FEP, and FRP) appear to leach less
less than the MDL, the mean normalized concentration is
marked with ≈.
lead than SS 304 and 316 casings did under simi-
lar conditions.
ples (Table 3f). Thus, statistical comparisons with
the control samples could be made only for the
Nickel
Concentrations of Ni in the control samples
40-day samples. Throughout the study, there was
were below the MDL, except for the 40-day sam-
no significant difference between the concentra-
8