Army Aircraft Icing
21
Table 7. Flight operations reports (by location) of flights disrupted as a result of
unexpected in-flight icing.
Location
Feb
Apr
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Mar
1
1
No impact
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
Moderate
Belgium
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
10
5
No impact
8
2
2
4
10
1
5
Moderate
Germany
3
8
8
7
1
0
1
Severe
0
1
1
0
0
6
2
No impact
6
2
3
6
6
0
4
Moderate
Korea*
0
4
3
0
0
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
No impact
1
0
0
1
3
2
4
Moderate
Fort Drum, NY
3
4
4
3
1
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
No impact
2
0
0
2
2
1
3
Moderate
Fort Campbell, KY
1
3
3
1
1
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
No impact
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Moderate
Fort Wainwright, AK
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
Fort Belvoir, VA
Not reported
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0
0
No impact
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Moderate
Fort Eustis, VA
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
USAR
0
0
No impact
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Moderate
Fort Sheridan, IL
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
National Guard
1
0
No impact
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
Moderate
Indiana
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
No impact
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Moderate
Minnesota
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
*Two returned questionnaires for 3rd MI BN at Camp Humphreys, Korea.
Key: No impact: Scheduled flights never cancelled as a result of unexpected in-flight icing.
Moderate impact: 110% of scheduled flights cancelled.
Severe impact: More than 10% of scheduled flights cancelled.
Note: The number of reports per month per location corresponds to the number of flight operations question-
naires returned from each location.
Previous Page
