Army Aircraft Icing
19
Table 6. Flight operations reports (by location) of scheduled flights cancelled as a
result of actual or forecast icing.
Location
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
No impact
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
Moderate
Belgium
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Severe
6
3
3
1
1
2
6
No impact
4
7
3
5
7
8
4
Moderate
Germany
1
1
5
5
3
1
1
Severe
6
5
1
1
2
5
5
No impact
0
1
5
5
4
1
1
Moderate
Korea*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Severe
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
No impact
2
3
0
0
1
3
2
Moderate
Fort Drum, NY
0
1
4
4
3
1
0
Severe
3
3
0
0
0
3
3
No impact
0
0
3
3
3
0
0
Moderate
Fort Campbell, KY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Severe
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
No impact
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
Moderate
Fort Wainwright, AK
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Severe
Fort Belvoir, VA
Not reported
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No impact
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
Moderate
Fort Eustis, VA
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
Severe
USAR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No impact
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Moderate
Fort Sheridan, IL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Severe
National Guard
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
No impact
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Moderate
Indiana
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
Severe
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
No impact
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
Moderate
Minnesota
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
Severe
*Two returned questionnaires for 3rd MI BN at Camp Humphreys, Korea.
Key: No impact: Scheduled flights never cancelled as a result of actual or forecast icing.
Moderate impact: 110% of scheduled flights cancelled.
Severe impact: More than 10% of scheduled flights cancelled.
Note: The number of reports per month per location corresponds to the number of flight operations question-
naires returned from each location.
Previous Page
