TABLES
Table
1. Methods for the detection of explosives recommended by the U.S. EPA ...........
2
2. Comparison between GC-TID-1 field and GC-ECD laboratory results
for explosives in solvent extracts of samples collected at the Fort
Leonard Wood minefield .....................................................................................
8
3. Comparison between GC-TID and GC-ECD laboratory results for
explosives in solvent extracts of archived soil samples collected
at military facilities ..............................................................................................
9
4. Comparison between GC-TID field and GC-ECD laboratory results
for explosives in solvent extracts of soil and sediment samples collected
at the Umatilla Chemical Depot ..........................................................................
10
5. ETV program GC-TID and reference laboratory accuracy based on
spiked soil samples (n = 20) ................................................................................
11
6. Number of GC-TID and reference laboratory spiked soil results within
acceptance range set by Environmental Resources Associates ...........................
11
7. ETV program GC-TID and reference laboratory precision for soil
sample replicates .................................................................................................
12
8. ETV program GC-TID and reference laboratory false-positive results
for blank soil samples (n = 20) ............................................................................
12
9. Comparison between on-site GC-TID and CRREL laboratory results
for TNT and 2,4-DNT in solvent extracts of ETV soil samples ..........................
14
10. Comparison between GC-TID and GC-ECD laboratory results for tetryl
in solvent extracts of ETV soil samples ..............................................................
15
11. Pre-demonstration results for HMX ....................................................................
15
12. Comparison between GC-TID laboratory and reference laboratory results
for HMX in selected ETV samples ......................................................................
17
iv
Previous Page
