five to ten minutes. These losses reflect what
and the silicone-modified TPE tubings had four
might be sorbed by a virgin material. However,
spurious peaks, and chromatograms for the solu-
conditions in the tubing are dynamic and fresh
tions exposed to the PP, one of the plasticized
water would be continually replenished as it is
polypropylenes (formulation 1), the P(VDF-
pumped through the system. One might antici-
HFP), and the fluoroelastomer tubings each con-
tained one spurious peak. The chromatograms
more losses of analytes would be expected, unless
for the solutions exposed to the rigid fluoropoly-
transfer to the atmosphere through the tubing was
mers, the polyethylenes, and one of the plasti-
significant. The question that then remains is how
cized polypropylenes (formulation 2) did not
much time is needed for the tubing to reach equi-
contain any spurious peaks. This plasticized PP
librium under dynamic conditions. Currently
tubing was the only flexible tubing that did not
there are no data available that answer this ques-
appear to leach any contaminants.
tion.
One test solution from each of the tubings that
for semivolatile organics by GC-MS. We reported
Leaching study
When we compared the chromatograms of
only those matches where the quality of the
sample solutions exposed to the tubings with the
match was greater than 75%. Unfortunately, we
control sample solutions, we saw additional
were unable to identify most of the leachates us-
peaks in the solutions exposed to some of the tub-
ing this method. The sample solutions exposed to
ings. By the end of the experiment (72 hr), solu-
PP and the TPE tubings had one major peak,
tions exposed to nine of the tubings had extra or
which was tentatively identified as hexanedioic
spurious peaks, most likely indicating that some
dioctyl ester (90% match). This compound is
constituents had leached (Table 5). The chromato-
commonly used as a plasticizer and lubricant in
grams for the solutions exposed to the polyure-
the manufacture of polymeric materials. The
thane, polyamide, and PVC tubings contained at
polyamide tubing leached one primary contami-
least eight spurious peaks, with polyurethane
nant that we tentatively identified as n-butyl-
having the most (12). The chromatograms for the
benzene sulfonamide (90% match). The GC chro-
solutions exposed to the polyester-lined PVC shell
matogram for the sample solutions exposed to
Table 5. Number of spurious HPLC peaks found during tubing material study
and possible identification.
Contact time (hr)
Possible identification
1
72
( % match )
Flexible tubings
Plasticized PP (formulation 1)
1
1
not identified
Plasticized PP (formulation 2)
0
0
hexacosane (90%)
PVC
3
8
hexanedioic acid, dioctyl ester (83%)
TPE
1
4
P(VDF-HFP)
1
1
not identified
hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl (78%)
Polyurethane
5
12
Fluoroelastomer
1
1
not identified
Rigid tubings
LDPE
0
0
XLPE
0
0
PE in an EVA shell
0
0
PE cross-linked to EVA shell
0
0
not identified
Polyester lining in a PVC shell
1
4
PP
1
1
hexanedioic acid, dioctyl ester (87%)
benzenesulfonamide, N-butyl (90%)
Polyamide
2
9
PTFE
0
0
PFA
0
0
ETFE
0
0
PVDF
0
0
FEP
0
0
FEP-lined PE
0
0
Boldface = Materials that leached several contaminants during the study.
10