nels in the ice surface, which, if filled with water
material and equipment lined up ahead of time.
and then frozen, tend to further break the ice since
This does not mean actually having the equip-
water expands when frozen. Most dusting in the
ment on hand but being able to mobilize opera-
past has been done much farther north than
tions in a short time. It is imperative to identify
Nebraska, so it is difficult to extrapolate timing
the sites most likely requiring dusting ahead of
since Nebraska warms up quicker and the sun
time, as resources and time are likely to be limit-
angle gets higher sooner. The most critical aspects
ed. Plans for dusting the Platte have been devel-
of timing, though, appear to be adequate sun-
oped twice since 1979. The State of Nebraska re-
shine, near- or above-freezing temperatures and
quested initial technical planning assistance for
lack of snowfall for several days following appli-
dusting operations from the Corps of Engineers
cation. It is best to study past climate data to de-
in 1980 and 1982. Dusting was not carried out in
termine the earliest that dusting can be effective.
either year because weather conditions became
Dust can be applied far in advance of breakup
favorable for natural melting prior to breakup,
if the intent is to weaken a midwinter jam that
although some ice jamming did occur. Table 19
freezes in place. Midwinter jams may not be very
summarizes the sites and materials required for
damaging at the time of formation but can cause
the ice-dusting operation planned in 1982. Even-
great damage at normal breakup if they freeze in
tually shorter or fewer strips were planned to re-
place and block a large portion of the flow chan-
duce the cost of dusting, but dusting was not done.
nel. Dusting can weaken the ice and reduce the
The dusting strips were chosen on the basis of
volume in a midwinter jam enough so that it does
historical ice-jamming problems. The effort that
not pose a problem later. The rate of melting will
went into planning these two proposed ventures
not be as effective as later, but since jams tend to
should serve as a guide for planning future dust-
be several times thicker than the ice blocks com-
ing operations. Other items should be incorporat-
posing it, more time is required to thin the ice.
ed to form an overall plan of action for dusting.
Multiple applications may be necessary because
The following is intended as a checklist in plan-
of the thickness and subsequent snowfalls. The
ning dusting operations, and a chart for estimat-
ice in some rivers may contain sediment that gives
ing the cost of the operation is also included.
it a dirty appearance and will accelerate the melt-
1) Identify sites for dusting. Sites of recurring
ing of this ice in a jam. Dusting to melt normal
historical jamming problems should always be
spring breakup jams has not proven very effec-
identified as possible dusting sites. The need for
tive because it generally takes too long to thin the
dusting these various sites may vary from year to
year, depending on conditions such as ice thick-
Planning an ice-dusting operation. Planning for
ness and amount of open water. If possible, these
an ice-dusting operation is essential since weath-
recurring jam sites should have aerial photogra-
er conditions may limit the window of opportu-
phy done just prior to freeze-up to identify the
nity for applying dust. It is important to have the
location of the main channel or channels. Dusting
Table 19. Example dusting plan for the lower Platte River based on the 1982 plan. All flight information is
based on using Wahoo Airport as a base of operations.
Distance
Number
Total
Site
Strip
Cinder
one way
of passes
Time for
time
each pass†
no.
Location
length (ft)
(tons)*
(miles)
(3 planes)
(3 planes)
1
Louisville
9,000
7.5
27
4
47.4 min
3 hr 10 min
2**
I-80\Salt Creek
16,000
13.3
22
7
41.4 min
4 hr 50 min
3**
HWY #6 Bridge
5,200
4.4
19
2
37.8 min
1 hr 15 min
4**
Elkhorn Exit
6,500
5.4
17
3
35.4 min
1 hr 45 min
5
Two Rivers
6,000
5.0
12
3
29.4 min
1 hr 28 min
6**
Ford Farm
14,000
12.0
13
6
28.6 min
2 hr 52 min
7
Fremont
10,500
8.8
14
5
31.2 min
2 hr 36 min
8
C&NW Bridge
10,600
8.8
13
5
30.6 min
2 hr 33 min
9
North Bend
6,000
5.0
18
3
36.6 min
1 hr 50 min
* Based on concentration of 0.5 lb per sq yard.
† Includes 15 minutes for landing, taxiing, loading, fueling, etc.
** Sites dusted in 1979.
44