Table 1. Concentrations of white phosphorus in ERF surface sediments
(CH2M 1997a).
No. of
No. of locations
Maximum
Arithmetic
Standard
locations
showing positive
concentration
mean
deviation
(g/g)
(g/g)
(g/g)
(g/g)
Area
results
A
195
26 (13%)
0.06202
0.00131
0.00705
B
43
0 (0%)
0.0
0.0
0.0
C
520
267 (51%)
1,100.0
3.49
49.5
C/D
42
4 (10%)
0.0121
0.000457
0.00195
D
36
0 (0%)
0.0
0.0
0.0
BT
85
38 (45%)
33.7
0.685
3.90
RI
62
45 (73%)
3,071.0
65.7
394.0
Coastal East
30
1 (3%)
0.217
0.000725
0.00397
Coastal West
6
0 (0%)
0.0
0.0
0.0
All ERF
1,090
381 (37%)
3,071.0
5.84
104.0
Based on tests conducted at an upland impact
to present a lethal dose to a mallard. In one study,
site, we determined that most of the white phos-
the largest particle isolated from collected sedi-
ments was 7.4 3.7 3.0 mm (82 mm3) and
phorus from the detonation of an 81-mm mortar
WP smoke round is deposited in a hot spot with a
weighed approximately 150 mg (Walsh et al.
diameter of approximately one meter at the point
1997). The surfaces of the recovered particles have
of impact. In these tests, substantial amounts of
been lustrous, indicating the lack of an oxide
white phosphorus were driven into the ground
layer, as would be expected in the anaerobic sedi-
within these hot spots. A several-meter-diameter
ments.
halo around the initial hot spot contained much
The size of the particles is important in terms of
lower levels of white phosphorus scattered from
persistence in unsaturated sediments. In mudflat
the initial point of detonation. Beyond this halo,
and intermittent pond sediments that periodically
only a very minor amount of white phosphorus is
dry below water saturation, the solid particles will
deposited. White phosphorus concentrations in
decrease in size due to sublimation from the parti-
the soil can vary three orders of magnitude over
cle surfaces (Walsh et al. 1995, 1996). Because
just a few meters because of this hot spot distribu-
small particles have greater surface to volume
tion (Walsh and Collins 1993).
ratios than large particles, a mass of white phos-
phorus will vaporize much faster if it is finely
divided into small particles than as a single large
Persistence of white phosphorus in a wetland
The cold, water-saturated, anaerobic sediments
lump.
of Eagle River Flats are ideal for storage of white
Temperature is the other major factor that
phosphorus particles. The rapid oxidation for
determines persistence in unsaturated sediments,
which white phosphorus is known takes place
because vapor pressure decreases exponentially
when the white phosphorus is in the vapor phase.
with temperature. During summers at ERF, typi-
The vapor pressure of solid white phosphorus is
cal surface (top 5 cm) sediment temperatures aver-
sufficiently high above 30C to result in spontane-
age around 15C with a diurnal variation of
approximately 10C (Fig. 2). At these temper-
ous ignition if exposed to air. To prevent this
atures, sublimation of a 2-mm-diam. particle bur-
mercial settings, white phosphorus is stored and
ied in unsaturated sediment is predicted to take
about 90 days. Oxidation will presumably hasten
manipulated under water. Solid lumps of sub-
the loss. At ERF, the sediments of contaminated
merged white phosphorus can be stored indefin-
permanent ponds could be decontaminated if
itely, although the surface of the solid may devel-
op a thin oxidized coating.
they were allowed to desaturate. Desaturation
requires that either the sediments be removed to
Detonation of WP munitions at ERF has con-
an upland site (dredging) for treatment or water
taminated the sediments with uncombusted par-
from the pond be removed to allow in-situ drying
ticles of white phosphorus. Most of the particles,
determined by microscopic examination of the
(draining). Given the enormous expense involved
sediments, are 2 mm or less in diameter (Roebuck
in removing contaminated sediment for treat-
ment, such as is the case in dredging (Walsh and
Collins 1998), an in-situ approach is preferred.
dimensions greater than 1.5 mm is large enough
3