Table 5. Results from second indoor study.
Fecal
Sample
Sample
Fraction
Total count
streptococci
date
time
no.
Description
(CFU*/mL)
(CFU/100 mL)
5.5 101
7/21
0930
1
yellow, smells bad
<2
3.4 101
7/27
1500
2
yellow, bad smell
<2
3.1 101
7/27
1500
3
relatively clear, some
<2
fine sediment, odor
1.8 102
7/28
1045
4
relatively clear,
<2
musty odor
3.0 102
<2
7/28
1045
5
relatively clear, faint
musty odor
4.8 102
7/28
1500
6
relatively clear, faint
<2
scent
5.3 102
7/29
0930
7
relatively clear, faint odor
<2
3.1 102
<2
7/29
0930
8
relatively clear, faint odor
1.8 102
7/30
0845
9
large sediment pieces
<2
4.9 102
7/31
1430
10
some large sediment, no
<2
distinct odor
8.4 102
8/6
1445
11
some large sediment,
<2
musty odor
7.8 102
8/7
1440
12
some medium-sized
<2
sediment, musty scent
1.3 104
8/12
1500
13
a few medium sediment
<2
pieces, slight scent
~106
8/12
1530
14
some fine sediment,
<2
musty scent
1.4 106
8/14†
0800
15
medium and fine sediment,
2
musty odor
1.2 106
8/14
0830
Rinse
Fine, medium, and large
4
water
sediment, foul musty odor
*Colony Forming Unit
†The final sample was not collected until 8/14 as a large chunk of ice remained, and it took two days
to melt.
crease dramatically as they did in the two previous stud-
tremely lethal to microorganisms, do not penetrate the
ies. There was little or no increase in the total number
earth's atmosphere (Brock 1970). Again, we see an al-
of bacteria when the sum of the bacteria in each of the
most identical survival rate of gram-positive and gram-
meltwater fractions is compared with the total number
negative bacteria in the meltwater, as 44% (12 of 27)
of bacteria in the snow column (Table 4). One reason
of the bacteria were gram positive (Table 6).
there was no increase in bacterial numbers may be be-
cause of the relatively short time period for this experi-
DISCUSSION
ment, three days vs. many weeks for the other studies.
However, the total counts did not show a significant
decrease, either. Thus it appears that sunlight did not
With respect to the snowmaking process, our find-
have a strong negative impact on bacterial numbers.
ings agree well with the unpublished findings of the
This finding is supported by literature reports that claim
Ontario Ministry of Environment (1982, as given by
Zapf-Gilje 1985) in that the losses of total and fecal
9