Table 3. Test conditions and types of tests.
Test moisture/density
Resilient modulus
CRREL
Hydrostatic
ω (%)
γd kg/m3 (pcf)
designation
AASHTO
Optimum
Saturated
Shear
compression
√
√
√
NH1
A-4
9
2050 (128)
√
NH2
A-2-4
14.5
1714 (107)
√
√
√
NH3
A-1-a
9.5
1730 (108)
√
√
√
√
NH4
A-1-b
13.6
1642 (102.5)
√
NH5
A7-5
23.5
1618 (101)
Table 4. Test temperatures for shear tests.
Test temperature (C)
CRREL
designation
20
0.5
0.5
2
20T
NH1
21, 34.5, 138*
103, 138 (15,20)
(3,5,20)
NH2
NH3
138 (20)
138 (20)
138 (20)
NH4
69 (10)
*Numbers in table are confining pressures in kPa (psi).
single value to represent the resilient modulus of
proximately 3.5 times less) in the resilient moduli
the subgrade, the test values are averaged at each
of the clay and the fine sand after thaw and before
temperature and presented in Table 11 and graphi-
freezing. It also appears never to regain strength.
cally in Figures 5 to 9. Analysis of the effect of con-
At positive temperatures, the resilient modulus
fining pressure, deviator stress, and temperature
remains constant.
on the resilient modulus is presented by Simonsen
It is well known that during the freezing and
et al. (in prep.). In all cases, as expected, the resil-
thawing process, the ground temperatures are
ient modulus increases significantly when the tem-
higher or lower than the air temperatures. Using
perature drops to below freezing. Observation of
the mean air temperature to determine the
the results indicate that the rate of change is larg-
monthly resilient modulus may produce signifi-
est between 0 and 2C for all soils during freez-
cantly different moduli values. The FROST model
ing and thawing. At temperatures below 2C, the
(Guymon et al. 1993) was used to estimate the tem-
difference in the resilient modulus during freez-
perature at the top of the subgrade. The top of the
ing or thawing is minimal. However, close to 0C,
subgrade was chosen since the current mechanis-
there are significant differences between the
tic model use the vertical strain at top of the
modulus obtained during the freezing and thaw-
subgrade as a failure criteria. Basically, the model
ing process. There is a significant decrease (ap-
is a one-dimensional vertical heat mass moisture
Table 5. Test temperatures for hydrostatic
compression tests.
Test temperature (C)
CRREL
designation
20
0.5
0.5
2
√
√
NH1
NH2
√
NH3
√
NH4
6