havior are relevant. They noted that their data
before (1983) with those after the ice jam. This
on winter fish distribution in the SCDRS suggest
jam represents perhaps a worst-case scenario for
that fish generally move to overwintering areas
ice effects. Fish catches were usually lower in 1984
in the fall and that wintertime movement rates
in both rivers, but Hudson et al. did not consider
are low. From their fish tagging and net catch data
the difference to be statistically significant. They
they further concluded that fish concentrations
felt that the lower catches may have been due to
are substantially reduced in the vicinity of the
the effect of lower water temperatures on the de-
channels and that fish that remain near the navi-
velopment of plant beds, general activity level
gation channel seek out the adjacent marshes and
and seasonal migrations.
channels as overwintering sites. They also noted
Muth et al. (1986) conducted a study on the
that the angler effort and harvest on the SCDRS
SCDRS to provide baseline information on the
were quite low in winter with the exception of
abundance and distribution of fish eggs and lar-
the yellow perch fishery. That fishery was con-
vae and to assess potential impacts on fish re-
centrated in Anchor Bay, an apparent wintering
production that might occur from extending the
area, which is well away from the navigation
lock operation season on the St. Marys River.
channel. Further, much of the St. Clair and De-
Analyses of the distribution and abundance of
troit Rivers remain ice free, limiting ice fishing
the eggs of 19 species and the larvae of 29 species
opportunities.
suggested that abundance varied significantly
To evaluate the validity of their postulated im-
between the St. Clair and Detroit Rivers and be-
pact mechanisms, they proposed that a two-year
tween the 1983 and 1984 data collection seasons.
study take place if the season were extended to
The number of eggs collected from the Detroit
evaluate possible impacts on fish and furbearers.
River (22,000) was more than 2.5 times greater
They suggested that such a study should be con-
than from the St. Clair (8,974). Rainbow smelt eggs
centrated on the St. Clair River, where they felt
dominated the St. Clair River samples, while those
that winter shipping would have the most influ-
of gizzard shad and white bass dominated samples
ence on fish and the sport fishery. Data from that
from the Detroit River.
effort could be compared with the information
Egg abundance was less in 1983 than in 1984
from their present report, which would serve as
for both rivers. Fish larvae were also less abun-
a baseline. Since their combined catch of nine
dant in 1983, but the difference was greater for
selected species varied approximately 28% from
the St. Clair River. Alewives were the most abun-
1983 to 1984, however, they noted that extended
dant larvae in both rivers during both years. The
season operations would have to cause even
larvae of rainbow smelt, various darters and
greater changes in the fish population to be de-
logperch were also abundant in the St. Clair River,
tectable. Further, since winter trap net catches
while gizzard shad and emerald shiners were
yielded only about 8% of those during summer
abundant in the Detroit River. The distribution
high-catch periods, it would be difficult to make
of larvae varied significantly between rivers, sites,
judgments about winter fish behavior.
months and study years.
Hudson et al. (1986) captured 1771 fish of 36
Muth et al. (1986) noted that both water tem-
species in 1983 and 1038 fish of 26 species in 1984
perature and ice conditions can affect the abun-
in the Detroit and St. Clair Rivers during the open-
dance of eggs and larvae. They attributed low egg
water season. The catches were dominated by yel-
and larvae abundance in 1983 to low water tem-
low perch, rock bass, hornyhead chub, spottail
peratures and a slow rate of warming. Although
shiners, striped shiners, rainbow smelt and white
the 1984 ice jam on the St. Clair River probably
suckers. These species made up 86% of the total
delayed fish spawning throughout the system,
catch. They conjectured that the fish communi-
they felt that rapid warming in May and June may
ties observed in their study did not exhibit obvi-
have resulted in greater egg and larvae produc-
ous ill effects from existing levels of winter navi-
tion than in 1983. While the water temperatures
gation. However, winter vessel traffic and other
at their sites on the St. Clair River were compa-
physical changes have occurred for many years,
rable in May of each year, June temperatures were
typically 35F lower in 1983 than in 1984 and
and there was no true baseline from which to judge
prior effects.
July and August temperatures were typically 1
2F lower. Water temperature differences between
As discussed in the section on benthos, how-
ever, a major ice jam on the St. Clair River in 1984
the two years were not as consistent on the De-
afforded an opportunity to compare conditions
troit River, but June and August temperatures were
34