6) Using the aqueous solubility or Kow values
Devlin, J.F. (1987) Recommendations concerning
of the contaminants or multiple linear sol-
materials and pumping systems used in the sam-
vation energy relationships may be useful
pling of groundwater contaminated with volatile
in predicting the ability to decontaminate a
organics. Water Pollution Research Journal of Cana-
da, 22(1): 6572.
Di Cesare, D. and J.A. Smith (1994) Surfactant
Clearly, further systematic study that evaluates
effects on desorption rate of nonionic organic com-
various decontamination methods is needed.
pounds from soils to water. Reviews of Environ-
These studies need to consider the type of mate-
rial(s) being decontaminated, a range in hydro-
phobicity of the contaminants, concentrations of
Paul, Minnesota: Johnson Division.
Dunbar, D., H. Tuchfeld, R. Siegel and R. Ster-
desorption also need to be addressed.
bentz (1985) Ground water quality anomalies en-
countered during well construction, sampling and
analysis in the environs of a hazardous waste man-
agement facility. Ground Water Monitoring Review,
ASTM (1990) Standard Practice for Decontamina-
Esposito, M.P., J.L. McArdle, A.H. Crone, J.S.
tion of Field Equipment Used at Nonradioactive Waste
Greber, R. Clark, S. Brown, J.B. Hallowell, A.
Sites. Designation D 5088-90. Philadelphia: Ameri-
Langham and C.D. McCandlish (1985) Guide for
can Society for Testing and Materials.
decontaminating buildings, structures, and equip-
Bagley, F.D and D.C. Weatherhead (1978) Sup-
ment at Superfund sites. U.S. EPA Number EPA/
port of NWC large scale decon study. Chemical
600/2-85/028, Hazardous Waste Engineering Lab-
Laboratory Division, U.S. Army Dugway Proving
oratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S.
Ground, Salt Lake City, Utah. NTIS Number AD
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
Fink, M.J. and R.T. Boyajian (1989) Decontami-
Barcelona, M.J., J.A. Helfrich and E.E. Garske
(1985) Sampling tubing effects on ground water
nation procedure for ground water sampling
samples. Analytical Chemistry, 57: 460464.
equipment. In Proceedings of the 3rd National Out-
Brice, D.A. and M.E. Kelley (1991) Evaluation of
EPA Region IV standard operating procedures for
Water Monitoring and Geophysical Methods, Dublin,
decontamination of field equipment when sam-
Ohio. National Water Well Association, p. 305311.
pling for volatile organic compounds. In Proceed-
Gillham, R.W . and S.F. O'Hannesin (1990) Sorp-
ings of the 5th Outdoor Action Conference on Aquifer
tion of aromatic hydrocarbons by materials used
in construction of ground water sampling wells.
physical Methods, 1319 May, Dublin, Ohio. National
In Ground Water and Vadose Zone Monitoring, ASTM
Water Well Association, p. 601609.
STP 1053, p. 108122. Philadelphia: American
Society for Testing and Materials.
Bryden, G.W ., W .R. Mabey and K.M. Robine
Hansch, C.S. and A. Leo (1979) Substitution Con-
water. Ground Water Monitoring Review, 6(2): 6772.
stants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biol-
Brusseau, M.L. and P.S.C. Rao (1989) Sorption
ogy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
nonideality during organic contaminant transport
Keely, J.F. and K. Boateng (1987) Monitoring well
in porous media. Critical Reviews in Environmental
installation, purging, and sampling techniques.
Control, 19: 3338.
Part 1: Conceptualizations. Ground Water, 25(3):
Cante, C.J., H.T. Dellicolli and R.J. Wright (1980)
A program to study the effect of additives in
Keys, R. (1980) Steam/hot water/chemical solu-
water-wash sprays. Chemical Systems Laborato-
tion decontamination system. Phase III, Final re-
ry, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Mary-
port. U.S. Army Chemical Systems Laboratory re-
land. NTIS Number AD B048312.
port number ARCSL-CR-80019, Aberdeen Proving
Classen, H.C. (1982) Guidelines and techniques
for obtaining water samples that accurately rep-
Leggett, D.C. and L.V. Parker (1994) Modeling
resent the water chemistry of an aquifer. U.S. Geo-
logical Survey, Open-File Report 82-1024, Lake-
vironmental Science and Technology, 28(7): 12291233.